Background information concerning Prosecutor vs Päivi Räsänen and Juhana Pohjola

Päivi Räsänen’s response to the charges

 Dr Päivi Räsänen, MP, denies all charges. Dr Räsänen has not defamed homosexual people on the basis of their sexual orientation.

The grounds for denial summarised by items of the charges:

(Click the titles for information)

In particular, in relation to counts 1 and 4 of the indictment, Päivi Räsänen has made a detailed case for the importance of equality for sexual minorities and respect for these minorities. Both her viewpoints included in the charges and the quite extensive background she has put forth on the importance of equality, these are based on the defendant's deep religious, Christian beliefs and convictions.

The prosecutor makes a number of false, inaccurate, even untrue allegations about Räsänen's views. According to the prosecutor, Päivi Räsänen's view is that "homosexuals are not created by God as heterosexuals are." Nowhere has Dr Räsänen said such a thing. Dr Räsänen stresses that she has repeatedly emphasised that all human beings are created in the image of God and have equal dignity and human rights. In the passage to which the prosecutor refers, reference was made to the biblical account of creation. Referring to it, Dr Räsänen stated: “In the beginning, God did not create human beings homosexual. God created humans heterosexual. He created a man and a woman and intended marriage to be between the two."

Contrary to what the prosecutor claims, in the Ruben Stiller radio discussion programme, Dr Räsänen did not call homosexuality a genetic degeneration or a disease-causing genetic inheritance. On the contrary, she rejected the idea of homosexuality as a genetic trait, a claim that was suggested by the host of the discussion programme, saying that the most recent studies have shown the possible genetic inheritance in homosexuality to be small.

Furthermore, the prosecutor claims that, according to Päivi Räsänen, the tendency to sexually abuse children is an inescapable characteristic of homosexuality. Dr Räsänen has not said this and does not think so.

Furthermore, the prosecutor claims Päivi Räsänen regards homosexuals as inferior human beings. Dr Räsänen regards homosexuals as fully equal humans and, in addition, equally worthy human beings created in the image of God.

The points of view for which Päivi Räsänen is accused do not deviate from so-called classical Christianity, nor does the defendant's view on marriage deviate from the official policy of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland. Since Christianity is the dominant (state) religion in Finland, it is reasonable to assume that views such as those of the accused are widely disseminated in religious communities in Finland – in social media as well as in private events. Likewise, the prosecutor's interpretation would have a material impact on the narrowing of the scope of religious freedom in Finland – and is therefore highly damaging from the perspective of fundamental rights.

 

Items to be prosecuted:

A. Päivi Räsänen

The prosecutor demands that Päivi Räsänen be punished for three different acts, each of which is punishable as incitement against a group (Chapter 11, Section 10 of the Criminal Code).

 
B. Juhana Pohjola

The prosecutor demands that Juhana Pohjola be punished for incitement against a group.

 

THE PROVISION OF THE CRIMINAL CODE ON WHICH THE CHARGES ARE BASED:

Chapter 11 (11.4.2008/212)

War crimes and crimes against humanity

Section 10  (13.5.2011/511)

Incitement against an ethnic group

 

Translation from Finnish, legally binding only in Finnish and Swedish

Ministry of Justice, Finland

The Criminal Code of Finland (39/1889, amendments up to 766/2015 included)

 Chapter 11 – War crimes and crimes against humanity (212/2008)

Section 10(a) – Aggravated ethnic agitation (511/2011) If the ethnic agitation involves incitement or enticement (1) to genocide or the preparation of genocide, a crime against humanity, an aggravated crime against humanity, a war crime, an aggravated war crime, murder, or manslaughter committed for terrorist intent, or (2) to serious violence other than what is referred to in paragraph 1 so that the act clearly endangers public order and safety, and the ethnic agitation also when assessed as a whole is aggravated, the offender shall be sentenced for aggravated ethnic agitation to imprisonment for at least four months and at most four years.

 
Edellinen
Edellinen

Päivi Räsänen: The Court will weigh the state of freedom of speech and religion in Finland

Seuraava
Seuraava

CNE News Liveblog: Live trial against Pävi Räsänen